AUM Start (Q1)
$3.06B
52 holdings · Mar 31, 2025
AUM End (Q4)
$4.49B
62 holdings · Dec 31, 2025
Full-Year Growth
+47%
13F portfolio value
Q4 Turnover
43.1%
Highest on record
Q4 New Positions
26
30 full exits same qtr

Quarter-by-Quarter Holdings

Q4 2025 · Filed Feb 17, 2026
Regime Rotation:
The Warsh Trade
$4.49B 62 holdings
Top 5 Holdings
1NTRANatera Inc.12.8%
2XLFFinancial Select SPDR6.7%
3INSMInsmed Inc.5.7%
4EWZiShares MSCI Brazil5.5%
5RSPS&P 500 Equal Weight5.0%
Largest New Buys
XLF $301M · US financials
EWZ $247M · Brazil EM
RSP $225M · mkt broadening
ENTG $71M · chip materials
Major Exits
META full exit (1 qtr)
BAC full exit → XLF
ARM full exit
TEVA −65% · −$335M
43.1% turnover — the most active quarter on record. This is not portfolio management; it's a macro regime change. Deregulation, EM recovery, market breadth, AI infrastructure upstream, and data center power now dominate. The biotech anchor held — NTRA still #1 — but the surrounding bets shifted completely.
Q3 2025 · Filed Nov 14, 2025
Biotech Peak Loading,
Meta Initiation
$4.06B 65 holdings
Top 5 Holdings
1NTRANatera Inc.~18%
2INSMInsmed Inc.11.8%
3TEVATeva Pharmaceutical9.8%
4TSMTaiwan Semiconductor~6%
5WWDWoodward Inc.~5%
Key Adds / New
NTRA +4.2% add · $741M
INSM +7.5% · $482M
META new initiation
AMZN new initiation
Exits / Trims
MSFT full exit
LLY full exit
WBD cleared
EQT reduced
Peak biotech concentration: NTRA, INSM, and TEVA combined exceeded 30% of the portfolio. Amazon and Meta initiated as tactical AI plays — both would be treated very differently by Q4. Eli Lilly exit notable; the pharma thesis is stock-specific, not sector-wide.
Q2 2025 · Filed Aug 15, 2025
Tech Re-Entry,
Broadening Thesis
$4.07B 65 holdings
Top 5 Holdings
1NTRANatera Inc.~16%
2INSMInsmed Inc.~9%
3TEVATeva Pharmaceutical~8%
4TSMTaiwan Semiconductor~7%
5WWDWoodward Inc.~6%
Key Adds / New
ENTG new · chip materials
MSFT new · enterprise AI
C new · financials
SE new · SEA digital
Exits / Trims
PM further trim
NTRA minor trim
WBD full exit
EQT reduced
A significant pivot: 35 new positions initiated — the portfolio exploded in breadth. Entegris signals AI supply chain conviction. Microsoft re-entry and Citigroup initiation show Druckenmiller warming to both enterprise AI and financial deregulation ahead of a policy shift he may have anticipated.
Q1 2025 · Filed May 15, 2025
Pharma Conviction,
Cyclical Exits
$3.06B 52 holdings
Top 5 Holdings
1NTRANatera Inc.15.7%
2TEVATeva Pharmaceutical7.7%
3CPNGCoupang Inc.6.8%
4WWDWoodward Inc.6.7%
5PMPhilip Morris Int'l5.9%
Key Adds / New
TEVA +65% · $229M
INSM adding conviction
DOCU new · enterprise SaaS
EQT new · nat gas
Exits / Trims
NTRA −4.6% trim
WWD −10% trim
PM −18% trim
UAL full exit
Druckenmiller doubled down on Teva at depressed prices, initiating the largest single move of Q1. Cyclicals like airlines and Seagate were cleared. Portfolio reads as defensive-value with biotech concentration — not a risk-on quarter.

The Narrative Arc: Quarter by Quarter

The Warsh Context — January 30, 2026
Trump nominated Kevin Warsh as Fed Chair on January 30, 2026 — after the Q4 2025 13F period had already closed. But Warsh spent 15 years as a partner at Duquesne Family Office managing Druckenmiller's venture capital book. Druckenmiller publicly called Warsh nomination ideal and said he was "really excited about the partnership between Warsh and Bessent." Reading the Q4 2025 13F without this context misses the signal: Druckenmiller was positioning for a Warsh-shaped policy environment before the nomination was official. The $301M XLF buy, the exits from individual bank stocks into sector ETF, the EM rotation on a USD softening thesis — these are not independent bets. They are a coherent macro posture aligned with a deregulatory, lower-balance-sheet Fed that Druckenmiller knew was coming.
Q1 2025 · THE FOUNDATION
Value-Tilted Pharma: Building a Base in Beaten-Down Names
Q1 tells a story of deliberate value accumulation. The 65% stake increase in Teva — buying an Israel-based generic pharma at depressed prices while peers panicked — is classic Druckenmiller: enter when the narrative is broken, not when it's confirmed. Simultaneously, he trimmed Philip Morris and began reducing cyclicals. The portfolio shrank to $3.06B (from a higher Q4 2024 base), suggesting some risk-off repositioning. Biotech remains the conviction core — NTRA at 15.7% of the portfolio signals a multi-year thesis, not a trade. The cyclical exits (UAL, Seagate) confirm he was not yet positioned for a broad economic reopening.
Q2 2025 · THE EXPANSION
35 New Positions: Casting a Wide Net Ahead of a Policy Pivot
Q2 is the most structurally interesting quarter of the year. 35 new positions in a single quarter is extraordinary for a concentrated macro investor. Entegris (chip materials), Microsoft (re-entry), Sea Limited (SEA digital economy), and Citigroup (financials) were all initiated. The breadth of these bets — spanning tech supply chain, enterprise SaaS, emerging markets, and US financials — looks like a man who sees a regime change coming but doesn't yet know which legs of the trade will dominate. In retrospect, the Citigroup initiation (later exited in Q4 in favor of XLF) and Entegris (doubled down in Q4) were early prototypes of the final Q4 thesis. Druckenmiller was stress-testing ideas he would either scale or abandon over the next two quarters.
Q3 2025 · THE CONVICTION PEAK
30%+ Biotech, Amazon Initiated: Highest Concentration of the Year
Q3 marks peak biotech concentration. NTRA, INSM, and TEVA combined exceeded 30% of the entire portfolio — an extraordinary bet for a macro investor managing a multi-billion dollar family office. NTRA alone approached $741M in value. The Amazon and Meta initiations in Q3 appear to test whether AI platform plays belong in the book. By Q4, Meta was fully exited after one quarter — the thesis played out quickly. Amazon was kept and aggressively added (+69%). The divergence reveals Druckenmiller's actual conviction: cloud infrastructure (AWS) yes, social media AI adjacency (Meta) no. The Eli Lilly exit also matters — it signals the pharma thesis is company-specific (Teva's generic recovery, INSM's pipeline), not a sector call on biotech broadly.
Q4 2025 · THE REGIME TRADE
43% Turnover, 26 New Positions: This Is Not Portfolio Management
Q4 2025 is the culmination of a year-long repositioning. The $301M XLF buy — the single largest new position — paired with the simultaneous exits of Bank of America and Citigroup, reveals a deliberate move from single-name bank exposure to sector-wide deregulation. The $247M EWZ (Brazil ETF) and continued building of Coupang and Sea Limited construct a coherent EM recovery thesis premised on a softer dollar. The $225M RSP (equal-weight S&P) is Druckenmiller explicitly betting against Magnificent-7 dominance. The Bloom Energy initiation (fuel cells for data centers) alongside the EQT exit (nat gas) completes a clean energy-of-AI trade rotation. And the ARM exit — despite his AI infrastructure thesis — confirms he exits on valuation, not narrative. The 13F was filed February 17, 2026, eighteen days after the Warsh nomination. The Q4 positioning had already been set. The receipts confirm the anticipation.

Five Structural Themes Across 2025

Theme 01
Biotech as the Permanent Core
NTRA held the top position all four quarters despite multiple trims. Druckenmiller's average buy price on NTRA is estimated at $88.5 — still well below the Q3 peak. INSM was accumulated every quarter from Q4 2024 onward. This is not trading; it is a multi-year platform conviction.
NTRAINSMTEVA
Theme 02
AI Infrastructure, Not AI Stocks
ARM exited on valuation. Meta initiated and exited in one quarter. Amazon kept and scaled +69%. Entegris (chip materials) initiated Q2, doubled down Q4. Lattice Semi (edge FPGAs) new in Q4. The pattern is consistent: capture AI capex spend, not AI narrative exposure.
AMZNGOOGLENTGLSCC
Theme 03
The Deregulation / Warsh Bet
Individual bank names (BAC, C) replaced by XLF sector ETF in Q4. Goldman Sachs added. The structural bet is on the financial sector benefiting from a looser regulatory environment — using an ETF avoids single-name risk while capturing the macro thesis cleanly.
XLFGSDAL
Theme 04
Emerging Markets: USD Peak
EWZ Brazil ($247M), Coupang (Korean e-commerce, +46% added), Sea Limited (SEA, added significantly), Mercadolibre (held). The thesis is a softening dollar unlocking EM repricing — not a single country bet but a structured multi-geography EM recovery position.
EWZCPNGSEMELI
Theme 05
Market Breadth & Mean Reversion
$225M into RSP (equal-weight S&P 500) in Q4 is an explicit bet that index leadership broadens beyond mega-cap. Delta and American Airlines initiated simultaneously — cyclical consumer recovery plays that only make sense if economic growth distributes more evenly across sectors.
RSPDALAALAA
Theme 06
Data Center Power Rotation
EQT Corp (nat gas producer) fully exited. Bloom Energy (on-site fuel cells, $64M) initiated. The read-through: AI data centers need reliable on-premises power, not commodity gas supply. Bloom's fuel cell model fits the direct power demand thesis better than pipeline exposure.
BELSCCENTG

What the 13F Doesn't Show

The Iceberg Problem
Druckenmiller made his reputation as a macro trader — currencies, rates, futures, commodities. The 13F captures only long US equity positions. Shorts are invisible. Macro positioning in FX, rates, and derivatives is invisible. Private holdings (including the Juggernaut Fund, the Duquesne-linked vehicle where Warsh held $100M+) are invisible. The 13F portfolio of ~$4.5B likely represents a fraction of total capital deployed. Treat this analysis as a reading of his equity conviction signals, not a complete picture of his book. The themes are real — but the sizing, hedging, and macro overlay that produced Druckenmiller's ~30% average annual returns from 1981–2010 are not visible in this data.